The Supreme Court considers the scope of prosecutorial discretion when considering mandatory minimum sentences.
The situation presented is almost Kafkaesque, and may well be one which will leave non-lawyers and lawyers like shaking their heads (in disbelief).
Court should override Crown discretion only in clearest of cases
Jones v. Tsige | 2012 CarswellOnt 274 | Ontario Court of Appeal
R. v. Barnes | 1991 CarswellBC 11 | L’Heureux-Dubé J. (dissenting in part) |
All professionals rightly seek to build a name for themselves and inspire confidence in their firms.
Party Seeks Representation by a Relative — Rules for Representation
MEALS AND LODGING Federal [A] claim .
The Dickensian character, Mr.
Modifying Conditional Orders of Discharge
R. v. Adamiec | 2013 CarswellMan 537 | Mainella J.
"Too swift arrives as tardy as too slow.