McManamna v. Farley | 2007 CarswellBC 2001 | 87 Smart J.

There is a point where the courts are being misused by constant and continuing efforts to keep a proceeding open instead of accepting the determination that has been made and moving on.

Canada (Attorney General) v. Mowat | 2011 CarswellNat 4191 | LeBel and Cromwell JJ

Over the past few years, Freemen-on-the-land or “OPCA” (organized pseudolegal commercial argument) litigants have had an increasing presence in the courtroom, performing contemptible acts such as denying the authority of the court, disobeying court orders, disrupting court proceedings and in one instance, attempting to arrest the sitting judge. This post provides a concise explanation of what may merit a finding of contempt of court.

Ultimately this litigation has a certain Alice in Wonderland quality.

R. v. McCall (2011) | 2011 CarswellBC 327 | G.M. Rideout Prov. J.

"[T]he only sensible course is to follow the time-honoured maxim, 'Sue everybody in sight.'"

Factums and books of authorities are supposed to have buff covers: