This post summarizes a recent Ontario case that involves nuisance, strict liability, remedies issues, and malicious prosecution

The back page includes a series of undertakings on behalf of the Corporate Defendants.

The testimony of the plaintiff as to his satisfaction with the Lexus was quite different.

Case comment on Dumais v Hobbs, a recent Ontario case which dealt with issues related to discovery and the parol evidence rule.

The reader will note from the suit number that this action was commenced eight years ago.

Tezcan v. Tezcan | 1992 CarswellBC 1 | British Columbia Court of Appeal

[The defendant], on the other hand, is a devious man and an unbelievable witness who will do or say anything to advance his position.

Quantum services are a powerful research tool for litigators that allow you to quickly assess the value of a claim. Learn how to use them on westlaw Canada.

Summary of recent Alberta case in which claim was made that a lawyer needed to take instruction from both the husband and wife to complete a transaction.

R. v. Campbell | 1972 CarswellAlta 125 | Alberta District Court

Interesting case from Newfoundland in which the defendant claims infringement of his fair trial rights because courthouse was named after personal plaintiff.

R. c. McRae | 2013 CarswellQue 11604 | Supreme Court of Canada